So how much money will the Council make
from selling the Pleasurama site to Cardy’s; the big hearted builders who despite being asked to sever links with the
original failed developers continue to have a close relationship with them in Lowestoft?
How much will Cardy’s contribute towards
the maintenance and repair of the cliff face which threatens to gobble up every last penny that TDC earns from the deal with Cardy? Will the
freehold of the Pleasurama site be
handed over to Cardy before the development is completed? What leverage will
TDC have over Cardy if they do not compete the development on time and how much
time are Cardy really being given to
complete. What power does TDC have to stop Cardy selling on the site once they have
got their hands on the freehold.? Will the flats ever be sold? Will a hotel
ever be built and who will it be managed by? There are so many questions which need
asking and which TDC’s pathetically condescending QA crib sheet on its website
fails to ask.
In what might be my last
act as Ramsgate Councillor, I asked to see a copy of the agreement with Cardy so
that I could find the answers to some of these questions. I then planned to
publish information from the agreement to keep the residents of Ramsgate fully informed about the
latest developments concerning this controversial
development which as blighted the seafront for over a decade. After unacceptable delays and the publication
of misleading council propaganda I was
eventually told by the monitoring officer, Steven Boyle, that the agreement contains a clause which "forbids disclosure and cites
commercial sensitivity as the reason".
Mr Boyles response is utterly astonishing. Council’s do
not normally sign agreements with developers which remain secret for what
appears to be perpetuity. Council’s are supposed to be accountable to the
public they serve. To keep the terms of this £multi-million deal with
Cardy secret is profoundly undemocratic and extremely worrying. Local people
have a right to know by how much they will benefit from the sale of
publicly owned property. They also have a right to have access to information which
will allow them to decide for themselves
whether the deal with Cardy represents good or bad value. Its utterly inconceivable that this secrecy clause could have been inserted into
the Cardy deal without the express authority of Thanet Council’s ruling Labour Cabinet which includes Ramsgate Councillors David Green and Rick
Everitt who are seeking re-election in
less than 5 weeks time.
I can only assume
that by approving the secrecy clause in the Cardy deal the Labour Cabinet are
trying to conceal important information about the Cardy deal from Ramsgate residents. Just as the Council did
when it imposed a High Court Gagging Injunction
on me which, with a threat of imprisonment, still unfairly prevents me from talking about certain
aspects of the Council’s management of the Pleasurama development and the
estimated value of the site.
The reason why the
Council’s Labour bosses are happy for the deal with Cardy to be shrouded in
secrecy must surely be because the deal is highly likely to be bad value for
Council and its taxpayers. Many people have speculated that in the long run the deal will cost the Council
and its taxpayers much more than it will ever gain. This is precisely why the
Labour Cabinet have supressed the truth from
the public by supporting a secrecy clause in the Cardy deal. But I guess I shouldn’t
be too shocked. After all it was the Thanet
Council Labour Cabinet which deliberately
kept the debt deferral deal with TransEuropa Ferries secret until the company went
bust almost 2 years ago owing the Council £3.4million. The people of Ramsgate
have been misled, deceived and kept ignorance
by a Labour-led Council for far too long. I have helped to publically expose
their undemocratic treachery. In 5 weeks
time you can vote for Green Councillors in
Ramsgate and Margate who end the culture of political corruption and secrecy which
has been a feature of Thanet politics
for far too long.
The Tdc contract forbids disclosure? That's illegal given FOI applies. They may as well have a clause forbidding Iris standing on her head. If she's signed that she should go as should Boyle for drafting it.
ReplyDeleteHave no other councillors raised this?