Said Driver “even allowing for Thanet’s higher than average
unemployment, the number of sanctions are massively disproportionate when
compared to other KCC areas . I can only assume that this is because Jobcentre
bosses in Thanet are more inclined to apply sanctions than their
colleagues elsewhere in Kent. I suspect
they are operating unofficial sanctions targets and putting pressure on frontline staff to sanction first and ask questions later.
Either way the statistics for Thanet suggest that something very unusual and
unfair is happening. The victims of this approach are most likely to be
vulnerable and disabled people especially those with mental health problems and
learning disabilities”.
Such is the level of concern about benefits sanctioning that
the Government’s own advisers, the independent Social Security Advisory Committee,
recently recommended that the Department of Work of Pensions (DWP) should review the santioning process (3). Earlier
this year the DWP Select Committee launched an investigation into benefits
sanctioning which heard evidence from several influential campaign groups and
charities about the impact of sanctions. The Public and Commercial Services
Union presented the committee with evidence from serving and former Jobcentre staff
which identified a widespread regime of unfair and discriminatory sanctioning and extensive
bullying of front line to refer claimants for sanctioning for minor issues (4).
Said Driver “there is no doubt in my mind that some of the
most vulnerable people in Thanet are being abused and forced into the most
severe hardship and poverty by the
insensitive and hard-line approach of
senior Job Centre bosses. This must be stopped. I also think that the
Government should be forced to reveal
how many people have died following the sanctioning of their benefits just like
the recent figures related to deaths following work capability assessments”.
Ends for more information contact Ian Driver on 07866588766
e-mail ianddriver@yahoo.co.uk
Notes
- http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/aug/27/thousands-died-after-fit-for-work-assessment-dwp-figures
- Number of sanctions per
benefits office and per Kent County Council District set out below.
Figures extracted from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/jobseekers-allowance-and-employment-and-support-allowance-sanctions-decisions-made-to-march-2015
District
|
Sanctions
|
Ashford
|
1,842
|
Canterbury
|
2,768
|
Dover
|
2,475
|
Dartford
|
3,018
|
Gravesham
|
2,579
|
Maidstone
|
2,731
|
Shepway
|
3,449
|
Swale
|
3,312
|
Thanet
|
6,342
|
Tonbridge
& Malling
|
984
|
Tunbridge
|
1,190
|
total
|
30,690
|
- http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jul/26/benefit-sanctions-review-urged-amid-concern-over-regimes-effectiveness
- http://www.jointpublicissues.org.uk/resources/rethinksanctions/
- http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/mar/24/independent-review-benefit-sanctions-urgently-needed-say-mps
No comments:
Post a Comment