In a press-release issued by TDC the then Labour Cabinet member Rik Everitt is reported as saying “I am delighted that we have been able to reach agreement with Cardy and bring this long-running saga to an end. This is a sensible solution for all parties, but most importantly of all this will bring about the regeneration of Ramsgate seafront and the town more generally …. Now at last we can move forward”. Thanet Labour Party went even further proclaiming in an election leaflet delivered to thousands of homes in Ramsgate that “Thanet Council’s Labour leadership has signed the deal with new partners Cardy to resume work on the Royal Sands … Labour has pledged that the £3million upfront cash boost will be ploughed straight back into Ramsgate”.
Well
9 months later, Cardy has still not begun work on the Pleasurama site and not a
penny of the promised “£3million upfront cash boost” has been invested in
Ramsgate. In fact it now looks as though nothing will happen on the Pleasurama
site until well into spring of 2016 when contractors Steadline Ltd re-start the
now suspended repairs and painting of the cliff face. This means that the earliest Cardy will be
able to begin building the long overdue Pleasurama development will be the
summer of 2016. So much for Rik Everitt’s misleading promise that “now at last
we can move forward”! In fact it now appears that that all of the self-congratulatory
propaganda about how TDC and its then Labour leadership had rescued the
Pleasurama Project from disaster was actually a cynical exercise in the wilful mis-representation of the facts.
Why
do I say this? Because just this week I received an e-mail for Tim Howes,
Thanet Council’s Director of Corporate Governance who in answer to my question – “please
tell me if and when the Pleasurama development agreement was signed by Cardy”
replied “the Pleasurama agreement has not yet been completed therefore the
council does not hold a signed copy of the agreement”. This statement can only
mean one thing - the picture of Labour Council Leader Iris Johnston allegedly signing
the development agreement with Mike Stannard of Cardy; the statement made by
Labour Cabinet Member Rik Everitt that an agreement had been reached with Cardy;
the Labour election leaflet claiming that a deal had been signed with Cardy
were are all untruthful works of fiction aimed at misleading the people of
Ramsgate. Shame on the Labour Party for
abusing the trust of local people in such a deceitful and manipulative way in
order to get votes!
The fact that the agreement with Cardy “has not yet
been completed” and signed raises many interesting questions. Has Labour’s
claimed “up front £3million cash boost” for the sale of the site actually been
paid to the Council yet? Will Cardy
downwardly revise their £3million offer to a much lower sum? Will Cardy demand that the site be handed over
for free or will Cardy walk away from the deal. Without a signed agreement any
of these options is possible. But whatever the final sale price might be, the cost of the repairs
to the cliff face and the legal fees associated with TDCs negotiations with Cardy will all be deducted
from that figure. Which brings my nicely to the subject of Steadman Ltd the cliff face repair
contractor. As I previously reported the
value of the cliff face repair and painting contract was, according to TDC, £314,
950. I have been advised that payments to date total £367,293
which is £52,343, or 16% over the
contracted price. TDC has said that work will recommence on the cliff face
repair and painting contract in the spring of 2016 which according a press
release on its website “is estimated to only
take a few weeks”. I reckon that this work will cost at least an
£150,000. This will bring the total cost of repairing and painting the cliff
face to £517,293 a staggering £202,343 or 64% more than the original contract
price. How can a variance of this astronomic magnitude be explained and
justified? Allowing for legal costs of at least £50,000 this means that a total
of £567,293 must be deducted from the reported £3million selling price of the
Pleasurama site leaving an upfront cash boost of just £2.4 million for Ramsgate – so much
for Labour’s misleading and deceitful election promises of “ploughing straight
back into Ramsgate” £3million. It was never going to happen and these
hypocritical excuses for politicians always knew that.
As
a campaigner for open and honest government in Thanet I am
sickened by the way in which TDC and its then Labour leadership appear to have published
misleading information about the agreement with Cardy. This information was
published during the May 2015 local and general election
campaign, presumably to secure support for the Labour Party. Many people would argue that politicians who
knowingly engage in deception, mis-representation, manipulation and telling un-truths to the public are not fit to hold public office. I would agree with that.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteWhy was the comment removed?
DeleteLin Fairbrass, Cllr Suzanne Brimm, and Chris Wells there are some questions that need answering and then communicated to people living in Ramsgate.
Delete1. Do Cardy own the freehold to the site?
2. Has the £3M+ been paid to TDC?
3. Has Shaun Patrick Keegan been removed as principal shareholder?
4. Have the Leases been revoked?
5. When will building work start?
6. Who is paying for the repainting of the cliff face?
Answers
1) Cardy will own the freehold of the site on completion!
2) Completion of the sale is expected to take place early in the new year and funds will be paid at that time!
3) Transfer of shares is a condition for completion!
4) This will happen on completion!
5) Development will begin after the final painting is completed in the spring!
6) Apparently, not all of the cliff face needs repainting. The problem with the paint has only occurred in a couple of areas. It was not the wrong paint, just the wrong conditions. That is why the decision was made to delay until the spring. Only once dry is it suitable for damp conditions. There will be no need to erect another scaffold as the area affected is at lower level and can be reached from an access platform. There will be no additional cost to TDC as the paint to be reapplied is covered under the defects warranty in the contract!
Cllr Lin Fairbrass.
The line "“the Pleasurama agreement has not yet been completed therefore the council does not hold a signed copy of the agreement”, would anyone care to say if it is common practice for the solicitor's to hold the documents (rather than the parties) during the interim period.
ReplyDeleteWhat is your point Barry James?
ReplyDeleteno point the questions were asked and answered. whether the truth is in those answers only time will tell
DeleteOfftopic but similar point on secrecy: Wells on Bbc news tonight confirming a £1m tdc compensation payment to Dreamland but with a gagging order so he refuses to say why the public are paying. It stinks
ReplyDeleteDriver for Newington councillor! Will u be calling for a police inquiry into pleasurama? And cancelling the injunction against you?
ReplyDeleteIs it £3m and if so why did the council want to incur court action to withold the info?
ReplyDeleteWhy haven't ukip cancelled pleasurama already?
ReplyDeleteWhat is Lin talking about? The leases expired in February and now almost a year later nothing has been signed so the site can and should revert to Tdc. There is no requirement for the Crowley dodgy deal with BVI and Cardy and it's on even thinner legal ice now! Shambolic
ReplyDeleteWhat terminated in Feb 2014 was the development agreement. The leases where sold by Ezekiel for £550K in September 2009 so have not ceased in any fashion.
DeleteA quibble barry as without the development agreement any leases are invalid. Presumably the leases are sold to sfp bvi who want to transfer them onto cardy...and with tdc approval? All of which could have been cancelled in Feb
DeleteWhy would tdc sell a £30m site for £3m and to the builders who didn't manage to build it?
ReplyDeleteBecause that's what the District Valuer said it was worth. The figure is more like 3.94M but what's a few thousand between friends
DeleteSo that's bad value for the taxpayer...who can insist the project is cancelled
DeleteIris and Everitt have lied to us over the signing of pleasurama...or has Howes? Why would Iris and Caedy pose for signing photos but not sign it?
ReplyDeleteYes Iris has pen on paper and witnesses in the photo...and yet she didn't sign and nor did Cardy?
ReplyDelete