The report describes the Dreamland scheme as having a
“substantial risk profile” and being “extremely speculative”. A SWOT analysis
of the project, carried out by GVA Grimely identifies “that the risk outweighs the benefits”. The risks identified by GVA
Grimely include –
·
Margate is not regarded as a key coastal
destination · Highly speculative in location
· Limited direct catchment not 360 degrees
· High cost of the development
· Need for annual investment to ensure product remains interesting and attractive
· English Heritage / listed building constraints
· Development of competition in and around more popular south east locations with consideration of the substantial scheme planned at Swanscombe for example (£2 billion Paramount Theme Park)
· Economy and weather
Said Driver “TDC bosses appear to have suppressed this important report and kept it secret from elected councillors. No mention of it was made by senior council officers and Council Leader Iris Johnston at the cross-party members briefing on the Dreamland project held on 23 February 2015, at which I was present. No mention of it was made at the Council’s Governance & Audit Committee held on 17 March 2015 at which councillors reviewed TDCs Corporate Risk Register. In fact, at that meeting councillors were advised that the risk of Dreamland project failing “would reduce significantly” to a medium to low classification because Sands Heritage had recently been appointed as the Dreamland park operator”(3).
“What has happened here is
utterly astounding” added Driver,
“Top council bosses and, I believe, certain members of the Council’s ruling
Labour Cabinet, were in possession of,
or knew about, a report from a large
reputable firm of commercial property advisers warning of the high risk
of the Dreamland project failing.
Instead of acting on the warnings and working to develop contingency plans to
secure the project, the report was withheld from councillors. At least £6 million of council
taxpayers money had been invested in Dreamland by TDC, democratically elected councillors
have a right to know if this investment is at risk, but they were kept in the
dark by the officer and political leadership at the council. This is plain
wrong”
“I have always been a big fan of Dreamland. It’s vitally
important to Thanet’s economy. But is becoming
increasing clear now that top bosses at Thanet Council and the Council’s
then Labour leadership have badly mismanaged the Dreamland project. They massively
overspent taxpayers money on developing
the project; misused Heritage Lottery funding (HLF); failed to keep the HLF properly informed about project progress
and the appointment of Sands Heritage (SH) as the park operator; delivered the flagship scenic railway months late causing hardship for SH; had to
pay SH about £1million in compensation for handing over an amusement park not
fit for purpose. Now it has emerged that top council bosses
and, I believe, some Labour Cabinet members, withheld warnings that the project had a high risk of
failure and appear to have misled councillors responsible for reviewing TDCs
risk register about the level risk faced
by Dreamland”“With incompetence, maladministration and cover-ups of this magnitude, is it any wonder that the Dreamland operator came close to bankruptcy and the future of the attraction remains in the balance? At least £6million of council taxpayers money has been invested by TDC in opening Dreamland – that’s £45 for every man, women and child. I think there should be a full independent enquiry into TDCs management of the Dreamland project which will, I hope, lead to the resignation or dismissal of those senior officers and politicians identified as being responsible for this monumental and expensive disaster. The council should, as a matter of the greatest urgency, also be developing a Plan B to identify and reduce further risks to this project and secure the future of Dreamland before its too late”.
Well said Ian yet more Tdc secrecy and incompetence. Why did Sands Hotel and not Dreamland Trust run this project?
ReplyDeleteWhy did Sands also sue Tdc? Yet another mess.
I take it you know where the Private money came from,both destinations? If not ask,Remember both destinations! Good Luck.
ReplyDeleteDo explain 01:18...
DeleteI'll let Mr Driver explain,when he discovers the the money trail if he doesn't allready know? Follow the Yellow brick road.
DeleteYou know nothing 19:33 other than trying to appear clever. If you know anything say so or run along
DeleteAll for one and one for all use only your logic 18:58.
Deletemeaningless again 12:43 - speak up or shut up
Delete12:43 vague cliches again. Speak up if you can or be quiet
DeleteHow comes Sharpe Pritchard the Law firm are there among the Dreamland,Hotel,pleasure deals and Manston investigation? If you would be so kind.
ReplyDeleteThe report seems quite a junior estate agent but rightly problematic it was hushed up and indeed the opposite stated by Tdc. Who was in the 2 meetings? Is it Iris playing games again?
ReplyDeleteSharpe are the same lawyers as PleasuramA? Hired by Tdc?
ReplyDeleteBy the coast tgus not 360 catchment....except tourists. Is this estate agent a plonker or a genius?
ReplyDeleteProblems with economy and weather. ...that rules out anything in uk then...
Howes at Tdc and SharpeP lawyers have some explaining to do after the Cardy deal and now Sands...and being sued for millions
ReplyDelete19:18 he's a plonker as no seaside town has a 360 catchment area. ...Bournemouth does ok....did we pay for this report for tdc backside covering
ReplyDelete