The
decision of Thanet Council's Labour group to support UKIP and
Conservative plans to seek a
partner to assist TDC's compulsory
purchase (CPO) of the former Manston Airport is an act of
unmitigated political stupidity which will have major consequences
for the people of Thanet.
First
there is the question of cost. Based on the abortive RiverOak
debacle, its likely that Council Tax payers will have to foot a bill
of somewhere in the region of £100,000 to pay for the work involved
in securing a new CPO business partner. Considering the precarious
nature of TDCs finances this is money which will have to be taken out
of front line service budgets or paid for by further council tax
rises next year. And for what? Many commentators, more legally
knowledgeable than I, have already said that it is extremely
unlikely that a CPO will succeed so why force the public to pay
£100,000 for what appears to
be a pig in a poke?
But
this is just
the tip of what could easily
become a massive
financial iceberg. The airport
site has been under new ownership for approaching 3 years. Clearly
the owners, like all businesses, want to see a return on their
investment. However the seemingly endless efforts of TDC politicians
to secure a CPO could be argued to have blighted the development of,
and investment in, the former
airport site. If the CPO process continues for very much longer then,
I would guess, that the owners may quite rightly conclude that they
are the victims of a politically motivated abuse of power. This could
possibly lead to court action against the Council with the owners
seeking compensation for lost income. Bearing in mind the scale of
the proposed Stone Hill Park development, compensation could quite
easily exceed the £4.2 million already paid out by TDC to the
cruel and barbaric live animal exporters or the £3-4million
compensation and fines which are expected to be imposed on Thanet
Council later this year when it is sued and prosecuted for the
“vibration white finger” scandal in which TDC unlawfully failed
to protect the health and safety of 20 or so of its staff. I reckon
that to wilfully blight, through an abusive use of the CPO process, a
development as large as
Stone Hill Park could easily cost £10miilion in compensation which
would have to be picked up by the council tax payer.
On
the basis of finance alone, it was clearly wrong of TDCs Labour
councillors to have backed UKIP and the Conservatives in their
extremely risky decision to continue with the CPO which is very
likely to cost local people a small fortune. Considering the massive
overspends and loses incurred when Labour ran Thanet Council such as
Live Exports, Dreamland and the TransEuropa Ferries disaster, which
undoubtedly cost Labour many council seats, I would have thought its
councillors would have become more financially prudent. Clearly I
misjudged their capacity to learn from their mistakes, demonstrated
by their support for an extremely risk CPO, which might cost
residents dearly.
The
next issue is jobs and the economy. There is absolutely no doubt in
my mind that a successful mixed use development at Manston would
create many more jobs than a re-opened airport. It would also attract
massive inward investment into Thanet from the organisations which
located to, and helped to construct, the site. In an area blighted
with rates of unemployment well above the national average; the
lowest wage rates in south east England; appallingly poor levels of
educational attainment and some of the highest rates of deprivation
and poverty in the country, a regeneration project such as that
proposed by Stone Hill Park is a once in a generation opportunity
which should be eagerly grasped with both hands.
By
supporting UKIP and the Tories in their search for a CPO partner,
TDCs 5 Labour councillors have turned their backs on the future,
supporting instead an action which will frustrate, blight, delay
and undermine the massive regenerative potential of a development
plan for the airport site which could be a key driver in kick
starting Thanet's troubled economy. Furthermore, I can't understand
why a party which is allegedly committed to tackling unemployment,
poverty and deprivation allows 5 of its councillors to support plans
which will undoubtedly make these problems much worse instead of
better. I thought the reason why Jeremy Corbyn had been elected
Leader was to transform the Labour Party into a rejuvenated socialist
force which challenged poverty and deprivation. Clearly TDCs Labour
councillors have not been listening to their national leader.
Last
but not least the environment. Airport's are renowned as being a major
cause of noise and atmospheric pollution. Considerable care,
attention and cost is now invested in planning strategic aviation
needs so as to protect the environment. As part of the recent
strategic review of airport capacity, chaired by Howard Davies, it
was concluded that Manston had no significant role to play in the
future aviation needs of south east England. So why should Thanet's
5 Labour councillors lend their support to saving an airport which
will not only pollute the district, but which has also been adjudged
by industry experts as being superfluous to future capacity
requirements. This is just plain stupid. But sadly hardly
surprising. Under the leadership of Clive Hart and Iris Johnston,
Thanet Labour councillors have actively despoiled Thanet's
environment; approving plans for 750 houses on farmland at the New
Haine Road; supporting the unnecessary and damaging Parkway Station
at Cliffsend and their development of a Local Plan which locates 60%
of their projected 12,500 new houses (now increased to 15,600) on
greenfield sites. Supporting the compulsory purchase of Manston
airport is a continuation of Thanet Labour councillors long and
appalling record of environmental vandalism, which once again starkly
contrasts with Jeremy Corbyn's insistence that Labour focus on
promoting the green agenda.
In
summary Thanet Council Labour Group Leader, Iris Johnston, and her
four Labour councillor colleagues by supporting UKIP and the
Conservatives on the Manston CPO have agreed to support a policy
which has potentially disastrous financial consequences; a policy
which will blight, undermine and delay the economic development of
Thanet and a policy which threatens to cause considerable
environmental damage to Thanet. What the “gang of five” have
achieved is to support a policy which runs contrary to fundamental
Labour Party values. An action I would argue brings the Labour Party
into disrepute.
So
how did the Labour Party get itself into this embarrassing position?
Easy pure electoral opportunism. Seeing the growth of what was then
a powerful campaign to save Manston Airport, Labour (Like UKIP and
the Tory's) cynically jumped on the bandwagon in order to secure
votes in the 2015 election. Even I was guilty of being mesmerized by
the power of the extremely well organised Save Manston campaign and
supported the CPO until I had properly thought the issues through.
Thankfully some people in Labour have also, albeit belatedly, been
thinking about the Manston issue and the South Thanet Labour Party
voted at the end of the 2015 to back a policy supporting a mixed use
development on the former airport site.
But
even though this policy was agreed in 2015 the South Thanet Labour
Party decided not to mention in it in any of its its election
literature during the recent Newington by-election. I wonder why? And
why despite having a policy supporting a mixed use development at
Manston, did councillors
Campbell, Matteface, Fenner and Constantine who are all South Thanet
Party Labour members, fail to
stop Labour Leader Iris Johnston from putting forward a pro-CPO
policy at the Council meeting last week, when this was clearly
against the wishes of a majority of their
South Thanet party
colleagues? If I was a member
of the South Thanet Labour Party I would be furious
and would be demanding that a
statement be immediately issued distancing the
party from rogue councillor
Iris Johnston. I would also be
actively campaigning for her removal as TDC Labour Group Leader. I
touched on these questions in my previous blog and produced evidence
to demonstrate that people in the Labour Party were indeed
extremely angry with Johnston
for supporting the Manston CPO. I was promptly removed from the No
Night Flights Facebook page for raising these serious issues of
political accountability without the opportunity to explain my
actions and even though the No Night Flights groups is allegedly
“non-party political”.
I
believe that in typical Labour Party fashion the deep and
acrimonious internal divisions about Manston Airport are being
covered up and suppressed to create a misleading public impression
Labour is united on the airport when clearly it is not. This is why
its election leaflets did not mention Manston Airport, this is why
Iris Johnston and her “gang of four” supported UKIP and the
Tories on the CPO partner. This is why an allegedly non-political
facebook, page, which in reality is controlled by prominent Labour
Party supporters booted me out without warning and without an
opportunity to explain myself for exposing the splits and
disagreements within Thanet Labour about the airport.
I
thought Labour under Jeremy Corbyn was all about “new politics”
which is tolerant of debate a differences. Not in Thanet where
Labour remains firmly North Korean in its suppression of dissent and
stupidly tribal in its approach to other progressive, anti-austerity
political organisations
Iris has failed and must go
ReplyDeleteIan publishing a screenprint without any prior knowledge is in itself plenty of reason to kick you out. Did you ask anyone who you have screenshot whether they minded?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Deleteanyone who posts comments on a FB page with 300 members must accept that their postings are very likely to be copied and elsewhere. Just as memebers of No Night Flight and Manston Pickle FB pages copy and paste screenprints of other people's comments from other FB pages. I think some people are being pathetically precious about this. They were in effect covering up for Iris Johnston and the anger she has caused in the LP. Its in the public interest to let this be known.
DeleteThe Labour group is making itself look unelectable by allowing Iris to continue as Leader following their drubbing at the polls last May. There is no way the other members of the group would have agreed to her comments supporting UKIP's nonsensical efforts to find a new indemnity partner. They have already banded together to give tacit support to Stone Hill Park. But if the other councillors won't depose her and take charge, they just look feeble and pathetic; as if none of them is prepared to take on the mantle of leadership.
ReplyDelete