I blogged at the time that Councillor Johnston’s position,
and the position of the Thanet Council Labour Group, was at odds with the
members of the South Thanet Labour Party who had voted before Xmas 2015 to
support a commercial, residential and leisure development on the airport site.
I pointed out that there was a great deal of anger amongst Labour Party members about Councillor Johnston’s support for
continuing with the CPO charade and I published
some Facebook screenshots of comments
made by Labour members (and a non-member) who were less than impressed with Councillor Johnston. I also speculated about whether
Councillor Johnston’s political career was going to be brought to a premature
end by her colleagues.
Well blow me down less than a week later and a post
mysteriously appears on the Thanet
Labour Facebook page which says “the Labour Group supports the regeneration
plans of the owners (of Manston Airport) as it offers a much needed employment opportunity
for our residents ….. such a move eases pressure on our grade 1 agricultural
land and protects greenfield sites”. So
the lady was for turning after all. In the space of less than a week Iris Johnston and her 4 labour councillor
colleagues had executed a 180 degree U-turn on Manston airport. I’m unsure
whether Councillor Johnston remains at the helm of the TDC Labour Group, but most
sudden changes in direction are usually brought about by a mutiny of the crew!
I know, and have never made a secret of the fact, that I
also executed a U-turn on Manston, but that was over 2 years ago. If only the
Labour Party, whilst it still had power in its hands, had done the same thing,
then there would be no talk today of CPOs and Development Consent Orders to
save Manston and the new owners plans for the re-development of the former
airport would not be blighted and held back by uncertainty and doubts resulting
from the making of poor political choices.
Although I warmly welcome its change of heart, the Labour
Party should nevertheless take some responsibility for holding back the urgently
needed economic development of Thanet by relentlessly pursuing a wrong-headed
policy on the Manston CPO. Some honesty,
truth and contrition about this matter wouldn’t go amiss.
But there is lot to be positive about. I personally feel
that Labour’s change of position on the airport removes a major obstacle which prevented
the Greens and Labour from working together on regeneration and environmental
issues in Thanet. I also feel that the removal of certain old-skool figures from
the Thanet Labour bureaucracy might also improve relations between left of
centre political organisations in the district. I am sure the new intake of Corbynistas know who these people are and will politically dispose of them soon!
In a practical sense this could lead to the Greens and
Labour working together to ensure that Stone Hill Park’s plans for the redevelopment of the former Manston
Airport site are environmentally friendly and sustainable. Collaboration will be much more influential than ploughing
our own furrows. I also think that the Greens and Labour should consider pooling
our resources and working together on a response to the Local Plan consultation
which takes place this summer. This will be massive task and will not be easy, but
the Local Plan is a once in a generation policy making exercise which will determine
the shape of Thanet for our children and grandchildren. Surely as people
concerned about Thanet’s environment, its economy and social justice and
fairness we can’t let an opportunity for collaboration like this pass us by?
More immediately is the question of Thanet Parkway station.
Thanet Labour Party in their 2011 election manifesto opposed the station because
it was environmentally damaging and totally unnecessary. The Greens share this
position. Sadly, under the leadership of Councillor Iris Johnston who was also the
Leader of the Council, Thanet Labour councillors reversed their position to one
of support, meaning that valuable agricultural land at the back of Cliffsend is
going to be concreted over for a 700 space car park and station. The area around the station
will quickly become a magnet to housing developers and Cliffsend will
soon become absorbed into Ramsgate.
Now that Thanet
Council Labour group has reversed its position on Manston Airport, now that their
leader has been overruled (and perhaps even removed - I’m not sure and I don’t know) surely it’s
time for Thanet Labour to rethink it’s position on Thanet Parkway? As their Facebook statement
makes clear they are now publically committed to “easing pressure on our grade 1
agricultural land and protecting greenfield sites”. Surely this means the protection
of Cliffsend against the Parkway station. Its time to talk methinks.
I've never understood Thanet Parkway. As far as I understand it the station would just be an additional platform on the line from Ramsgate to Canterbury. As if there aren't enough stations on that line already. I can't see any rationale for building a new station other than somebody might make a pile of money by selling land for the station and the associated car-parking. Ooo err, did I hit a nail?
ReplyDeleteMore idiocy from Thanet Labour - why bother Greens and Labour working together?
ReplyDeleteThanet Labour are finished after this farce and only have 5 councilors anyway. Oblivion beckons.
SHP makes no sense either except as housing overbuild and speculation - build a park instead
The Parkway was meant to be a cargo stop for the 24/7 airport - now I;s simply KCC wasting money trying to justify it.
Thanet Labour is finished
ReplyDeletePerhaps Thanet Labour just realised they may have trouble standing up the S106 agreement which Riveroak would rely on in their application to Planning Inspectorate ? An interesting twist as Riveroak may have a cause of action to seek damages off TDC ?
ReplyDeleteGiving Sands Heritage a million for failing ? May have to pay out Riveroak yet on much the same basis. Paying damages for setting up enterprise to fail ......
Judging by Labour's performance in the most recent by-election in Thanet, the party is far from finished and is on its way back from the morass into which Iris dragged them. I agree that Iris might be finished, but that's another thing altogether. As for Parkway, this is a waste of money project driven by Roger Gale and his Tory colleagues for no, apparent, good reason. The sooner Labour comes out and says that the new station is not needed, the better. It can only help to make them more electable.
ReplyDeleteWho would replace Iris?
ReplyDelete