Former Green
Party councillor and 2015 South Thanet Parliamentary candidate, Ian Driver, has announced that he will defy his party’s policy
of remaining in the EU and campaign instead for Brexit.
Driver’s
announcement follows news that Thanet District Council (TDC) has paid out almost £6million in compensation
and legal fees following its 2012 decision
to suspend the export of live farm animals from the Port of Ramsgate. According to figures released on Thursday (5th May) £4,692,630 in compensation payments have been made to companies involved in the export of live farm animals from the port of Ramsgate. A further £454,220 has been spent by TDC on its own legal fees, bringing the total to £5,146,500.
It is
understood that TDC has yet to settle a number of outstanding compensation
claims related to the suspension of live animal exports from Ramsgate port which
could take the final compensation
costs to over £6million.
It is estimated
that further £5 million, at least, of taxpayers money has been spent on the costs of:
- deploying DEFRA Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) officers to supervise each the of
115 shipments which have taken from Ramsgate and Dover since 2010
involving over 350,000 animals
facing long journeys of several days,
in cramped conditions with limited access to food and water
- the costs of policing the 100 plus lawful protests at
the ports of Ramsgate and Dover which take place at every shipment; the
costs to TDC of employing
additional security staff whenever there is a shipment;
- the costs of preparing and holding at least 20 largely
unsuccessful, court cases related
to live animal exports which have
taken place since 2011.
- the costs of police surveillance against anti live animal export campaigners. At least
one of whom, Ian Driver, is now, because his of activities included on the Polices’ so-called Domestic Extremist Database (1).
This takes the
total costs to UK taxpayers of supporting a trade’ which most people oppose on
the grounds of animal cruelty, but which is supported by the EU, to at least £11milion over the past
5 years.
The suspension
of live animal exports from Ramsgate Port, which led to the astronomic
compensation payments was imposed, by then then Labour controlled, TDC in September 2012 after 47 sheep, judged
to be unfit to travel, had to be destroyed at the port.
At a High Court Hearing in December 2013 Mr
Justice Birrs declared that the suspension “was an unjustifiable breach of Article 35 of the Treaty of the
Functioning of the European Union” which “breached a fundamental element of the
rules governing free trade in the EU”. The judge concluded that “in my judgment the council is liable to
damages to the claimants”.
Driver,
one of the founders of the campaign
against live animal exports from Ramsgate said
“I’m astounded by the latest
revelations. It seems likely that that the final bill for TDCs suspension of live exports from Ramsgate could easily top £6million! That’s
£45 for every man woman and child in living in Thanet”. This appalling
and unfair situation is a direct result of our loss of law making powers to the EU.”
“But what makes
me most angry is that some of those who
have benefited from the £4.6 million compensation payments are likely to be the same people who were convicted at Dover Magistrates Court
in 2014 of animal cruelty offences related to the events which led to the suspension of live exports from Ramsgate in 2012”.
“In all
conscience I cannot vote to remain in the EU when it actively endorses
industrial scale animal cruelty by permitting this medieval trade and then
rewarding the perpetrators of that trade
with compensation payments akin to blood money when its interrupted because
animals died in transit. Furthermore, EU
rules have forced British state to deploy, at massive public expense, thousands
of police officers to enable a trade, most people don’t approve of, to take
place, and some of those people who have
campaigned against it now find themselves with criminal records and classified
as domestic extremists.
I can understand the feelings and frustrations of anyone witnessing any aspect of this Unnecessary trade in Live animals for religious slaughter. And politics has played its full hand in that . UK Politics and European Politics, share the joint blame in this. Currently The Dutch Livestock Transporter submits a Journey log approval to DEFRA( WIT) Welfare in Transit. But that journey log bears little relationship to what actually happens to the livestock en route. As the Livestock Transporters claim that a DUTCH Court ruling based upon government revenue claims allows them to use the Dutch "Interbove" ruling . This ruling it is claimed , but so far I have seen neither any DUTCH or UK regulatory authority confirmation that under this ruling the Channel crossing using a Latvian registered Barge, permits NONE of crossing time to be counted towards total journey time and again channel crosssing is permitted to be counted as Animal rest time. Under the EU regulations adopted by the UK any time on a RO-RO barge is not permitted to be counted as Animal rest time. And all RO-RO barge time is counted in total towards journey time. WIT (UK) will not authorise any Journey Log submitted penned outside of the EU/UK regulations. Hence the Transporters submit an approval under that EU/UK regulation, but the Journey undertaken by them differs significantly from the data upon which the UK regulatory authority approved the journey. WIT have indicated that if the Livestock Transporter submitted in the UK what he intended to do en route then that journey would not be approved. Start from there and follow it with much other questionable data from these transporters and you in my view have significant system abuse involving live animals . The Politics of the UK has not in my view ensured that the Journey Log approval by DEFRA/WIT is complied with , in fact it is rubber stamping the JL knowing that it is not being conformed with en route . Leaving the EU will not stop this trade but will in theory allow much less control over the complete logistics operation . AS NOW.
ReplyDeleteIt is time to find out what is actually happening to the livestock throughout. the other areas which need looking at include HGV excess driving hours and the actual destinations and position of the transporters . My own view is that Transporters have claimed to be at an unloading destination when their Transporter is at the same time recorded as being elsewhere . Time to stop pushing for Brexit , but to find out what is actually happening throughout this Transport operation. And do not trust any of the politicians who claim they may arrive at different UK Port operation regulations. The money has been neatly pocketed by the Transporter companies and nobody has looked closely enough and what Politics has not been doing in the UK. Am I suggesting that this operation has been carried out illegally ? in part yes, and in part using loopholes and miss information. All my view only .
Roger Interesting points I'd be very happy to discuss this with you in more detail. My e-mail is ianddriver@yahoo.co.uk perhaps we can talk
Deletehave the police taken you off the extremist database and provided a copy of your file to you?
ReplyDelete