Information about the  spiralling construction costs  has  been  in
the public domain from  the beginning of
this year and it’s inconceivable that leading politicians  would  not have been briefed about the growing costs
of this prestigious infrastructure project 
before  that data  became publicly available.  But, as far I can establish, not a single  UKIP, Tory or 
Labour politician has made a public utterance about this important
matter.  Even our 8 Kent County Council  (KCC)  councillors, who are elected members of the
council which  is building the station
have been tight-lipped  about Parkway.
It’s
not as though Parkway  is a small
insignificant issue which politicians could be forgiven for forgetting  about. This is a major public transport
infrastructure project for the Thanet area which some people have argued
(wrongly I believe) will  be beneficial  for the  economic   fortunes of this part of Kent. This is a
project which was also subject to a high profile public consultation exercise just
over a year ago. A second round of public consultation which was supposed to
have taken place this spring, has been postponed until the autumn.
Apart from
the silence of Thanet’s political establishment  and the postponement of the  public consultation on the station plans, I’ve
also discovered that there have been precious few meetings at which the huge Parkway
cost increases have been discussed by our politicians. I’ve checked reports and
minutes of all the relevant Kent County Council committees which have taken
place during the period in which the cost escalation came to light and can find
no references to any discussion or reports about Parkway. I have checked all
the relevant TDC meetings over the same period and once again Parkway has not
been discussed. Even Thanet Council’s Joint Transportation Committee (JTC)
which includes  KCC and TDC councillors
and  which was set up for the  purpose of  discussing  and monitoring  public transport plans and projects in the
district,  has not considered Parkway once
at any of its meetings over the past 8 months, even though it’s likely to
become  one of the largest infrastructure 
projects in Thanet. 
The only organisations to have discussed the escalating
Parkway construction costs are the Kent and Medway Economic Partnership (KMEP)
and the South East England Local Enterprise Partnership (SEELEP).  Enterprise partnerships were set up in 2011 to
replace the old Regional Development Agencies, such as  the  South East England Development Agency (SEEDA) which
were  abolished  by the Coalition Government. They are responsible
for developing economic plans and strategies for  the areas they cover  and also distribute £millions in  regional growth and EU  grants.
These organisations are extremely secretive.
Their meetings are held  behind closed
doors with no public right of access. They are not subject to Freedom of
Information rules, even though they are paid for by taxpayers money and administered
and supported by council employees.  Their
governing bodies  are dominated by the private
sector  with business bosses, many from  property development and related  industries,  making up  50%  of
their  board members (the rest from the
public sector including councillors) . Its unclear what criteria are used to
appoint the business bosses to the boards and  systems to register the
interests  of board members seems to be rudimentary
or non-existent. 
I  am very concerned  about the probity  of  Enterprise
Partnerships. To put business leaders, especially those with property development
related interests or connections,  in
charge of preparing regional economic plans,  allocating £millions in grant  funding,  and having  access to commercially sensitive local
authority information,  is certain to lead
to massive conflicts of interests, and to increase the risk of  out and out corruption.  And I’m not the only person to be worried about
this. Last year the Government’s National Audit Office (NAO)  produced a report which said
Local Enterprise Partnerships
are another area of potential risk (of corruption and conflicts of interest). There
has been some media attention questioning the impartiality of funding decisions
given the risk that some members have business interests and could benefit
personally, for example in planning applications.The other thing which concerns me is that organisations like the LEPs are able to use their enormous financial leverage to bully and browbeat elected politicians into doing their bidding even though local people might be opposed to the LEPs plans. This is exactly what, I believe, has happened in the case of Parkway Station. KMEP and SEELEP set their minds on having a Parkway station in Thanet several years ago. But not, as they originally had us believe, to service the former airport, but for the purpose of opening up huge swathes of rural Thanet around the Cliffsend, Westwood and Manston area to the property development industry which is so strongly represented on the KMEP and SEELEP boards. A better, more lucrative, investment opportunity for property developers would be hard to find anywhere else in Kent
Hundreds of acres of prime agricultural land ideal for house building, situated close to a new station on a high speed rail line which will soon have sub-1 hour journeys to London. The profits from a development project on this scale could be staggering.
I believe that
Thanet’s political establishment  have allowed
themselves to be  bribed and bullied by  KMEP and SEELEP (and Kent County Council) into
to accepting this plan with the promise of massive increases in council tax
revenues  from the thousands of new homes
which are almost certain to be built around the Cliffsend and the Westwood area
should planning permission for Parkway Station be granted. Take Thanet Labour
Party – a one time-staunch opponent of Parkway Station. In less than a year of
taking control of TDC its leader, Clive Hart,  was supporting Parkway ( I will be writing
more  about this shortly) . Look at UKIP and
the Tories - just last year they  stood
for elections on a programme  of   opposing
Labour’s proposals to build 12,000 new houses in Thanet, yet their councillors have
failed to oppose one of the main driving forces behind such overdevelopment –
Parkway Station. The enormous power which KCC, KMEP and SEELEP wields over Thanet Council and it so-called politicians also explains why UKIP, Labour and the Tories have remained silent about Parkway Station and the massive cost increase. Why they have not held meetings to talk about this important issue and why they are content to let meetings in Purfleet and Maidstone decide what happens to our countryside and green fields. For fear of upsetting their masters at KCC, KMEP and SEELEP they have stifled democratic debate in order to prevent the already strong opposition to Parkway becoming stronger.
I have said it  before and will say it again - the building of
Parkway station is totally unnecessary. It will add to, not reduce, journey
time to London. The capacity of our existing stations to cope with more
passengers can easily be met by developing and improving safe cycling and
walking routes, by introducing better bus services and expanding existing car
parking facilities. There is already sufficient land available, especially
brown field land at the former airport site and elsewhere, to build the extra
housing required to meet Thanet’s future needs. The concreting over of hundreds,
if not thousands,  of acres of  our precious green fields around Cliffsend and
Westwood to build Parkway and all the houses which will inevitably go  with it  is  totally
unnecessary and will cause massive environmental damage to Thanet. Finally what about democracy and the wishes of local people? Almost every one of the hundreds of comments submitted to the first Parkway Station public consultation last year was opposed to it. Yet our politicians – Labour, UKIP and Tory have totally failed to stand up for their constituents. They have shamefully refused to speak out about the project when it’s clear it faces huge cost increases. They have failed to hold meetings to discuss the spiralling costs of the project and to decide whether it is actually needed. They also seem to be content to allow non-elected business leaders, some of who may possibly have significant conflicts of interest, to make decisions about the future of Thanet at meetings held in Purfleet and Maidstone. And even before those meetings have been held the Thanet Gazette is reporting that KCC and TDC have decided (presumably with the approval of Chris Wells and Paul Carter) to push ahead with developing an unnecessary, expensive and massively polluting Parkway irrespective of what might think. This is not local democracy it’s a dictatorship which will only be ended by election of independent politicians who are prepared to fight against the establishment and the constraints of the corrupt, old fashioned party political system, which lies to and deceives the people.

I note that the plans for an ice rink at Westwood seem to have gone by the wayside does this mean that it conflicts with S.H.P Pipe dreams so it has to be stopped or did the wrong Person dare to bring it up
ReplyDelete