The figures, which cover the
period April until August 2013, are the first to identify how many households
have lost housing benefit payments since the introduction of the bedroom tax in
April 2013.
In August, the most recent
period for which figures are available, 788 people living in Swale lost an
average of £900 per year in housing benefit, making it the worst affected
district in Kent.
The least badly affected
district is Dartford, where 365 people have lost an average of £894 per year in
benefits.
In Thanet 610 households
have lost on average £770 per year in Housing Benefits.
An estimated £6 million will
have been slashed from Kent’s housing benefit payments by the end of the first
year of the bedroom tax. The average loss per Kent affected household has been
calculated to be a staggering £868 per year.
Thanet Green Party Councillor, Ian Driver, said: “The bedroom tax is having a major
impact on the most vulnerable and low-paid people in Kent. There are simply not
enough smaller rented properties to move into, so people already living on a low
income are being forced to cut back even further on essentials such as food,
heating and clothing. This ill-conceived policy will force thousands of
families in Kent into poverty.”
Evidence is now beginning to
emerge that many households caught by the bedroom tax are falling into rent
arrears. A survey carried out by the National Housing Federation estimates that
more than 50% of housing association tenants who are affected by the bedroom
tax have fallen behind with rent since the introduction of this policy (2).
The Green Party opposes the Bedroom Tax. It is unfair and
targets some of the most vulnerable and deprived people in society. The Party calls upon Kent
Councils not to evict anyone falling into rent arrears as a consequence of the
bedroom tax. The Green Party, alongside many charities, disabled groups and
trade unions is campaigning for the
immediate abolition of the bedroom tax. ENDS
Notes
1. The
Impact of Bedroom Tax on Kent.
Local authority
|
Households hit by
bedroom tax
|
Average amount lost
per year
|
Estimated total loss of benefit payments for 2013
-14
|
Ashford
|
604
|
£807.76
|
£487,428
|
Canterbury
|
534
|
£829.66
|
£442,686
|
Dartford
|
365
|
£894.33
|
£315,360
|
Dover
|
621
|
£750.90
|
£465,750
|
Gravesham
|
712
|
£812.32
|
£578,144
|
Maidstone
|
636
|
£904.89
|
£574,944
|
Sevenoaks
|
480
|
£976.35
|
£468,480
|
Swale
|
788
|
£899.77
|
£574,944
|
Shepway
|
453
|
£775.12
|
£351,075
|
Tonbridge
and Malling
|
660
|
£1,013.02
|
£668,580
|
Tunbridge
Wells
|
458
|
£986.07
|
£451,588
|
Thanet
|
610
|
£770.84
|
£469,700
|
6,921
|
av loss =
£868
|
£5,848,679
|
2. See
National Housing Federation press release
http://www.housing.org.uk/media/press-releases/more-than-half-of-families-hit-by-bedroom-tax-pushed-into-debt
it is not a tax, taxes are paid on wealth, consumption or income (generally by those working) it is a housing subsidy. Glad it has been reduced, I pay enough money to keep the unemployed in fags and booze as it is.
ReplyDeleteYour statement, anon @ 15.13 is based on total ignorance and reveals a despicable, selfish and stupid mindset!
DeleteYes it has been classified as a tax , and most of these unemployed people have worked throughout their lives at some points, paid tax whether employed or unemployed as well
DeleteIt has been inaccurately called a tax as a propaganda expedient. How many households in Kent actually receive housing benefit, without that information, the figure above are meaningless.
DeleteIt is no overstatement to claim that we are living in a holocaust by stealth, where the most vulnerable in society are being targeted, while the rest of us either don't notice, don't care, or in some disturbing cases, 15:13, are actually enjoying it.
ReplyDeleteThis bedroom tax is both cruel and unnecessary and will lead to bigger social problems down the road, for example, as spare bedrooms are let to complete strangers to cover the bills.
Our senior citizens are being euthanised on the NHS Care Pathways, 100,000 so far and rising, while suicides are up, especially among kids and there are record numbers of youngsters on ADHD drugs, largely due to excessive vaccinations and food additives, as well as financial incentives given to welfare mothers to claim their kids as suffering from ADHD, which is just a made up load of old quackery, whichever way you look at it.
There is a ticking time-bomb of kids being irreparably damaged by WIFI transmitters in the school classrooms, and nearly everyone appears to have a GSM glued either to their hand or the side of their head. THE MICROWAVES ARE KILLING YOU, YOU MUPPETS!
Class A drug use is hitting epidemic levels, largely due to generations of ADHD kids brought up on Ritolin etc., and we all know who is bringing the drugs in, don't we? That's right, the same people who are exporting British kids, to wealthy perverts and it would not surprise me if Manston were being used for this purpose; it does seem rather odd to have two airlines with nazi/freemasonic links and histories, both serving a quiet and isolated airport that no one else will touch with a bargepole. 10,000+ children per year, across the UK, are being stolen from loving parents by the social services for this racket, and Thanet does seem to have more than it's share of children's homes. Are they holding centres?
The book 'The Wizard of Oz' was written at the turn of the 20th century, by Frank Baum, who was privy to the international bankster's plan. Baum wrote this book in the hope that he would inspire generations of youngsters to become strong of body, mind and spirit and to ultimately take down the criminal banking oligarchy, before they take down Humanity.
The clues are in the book, let's take these bastards down!
http://www.pagebypagebooks.com/L_Frank_Baum/The_Wonderful_Wizard_of_Oz/
The argument that the Bedroom Tax forces people to downsize is about as sensible as praying to the Flying Spaghetti Monster because there are no properties to down size to. The result is while five hundred grand is not spent on benefits most of that is eaten up in paperwork costs and discretionary payments and further administration and hard work for people that could better be placed helping get TDC fit for purpose. The emperor, as they say, is naked.
ReplyDelete