The agreement of such a Protocol will of course mean that I can end my campaign to allow the public to record meetings and that expensive and unnecessary investigations and hearings into my undercover filming can be stopped.
Most importantly of all the adoption of this Protocol will mark a major step on the journey of TDC becoming more open transparent and accountable to local people. Just like the Independent Members of the Council's Standards Committee would have wanted before they were shamefully forced to resign
Thanet
Council Draft Recording Protocol
1.
Recording and reporting of meetings of Council and Committee
The Council strives to be open and transparent
in the conduct of all its business. As part of this commitment the Council welcomes
and encourages, filming photography, audio recording, tweeting, and text messaging
and live blogging of all Council and Committee meetings.
The Council encourages the broadcasting of any
recording of its proceeding via social
media such as Facebook, Twitter, blog sites and website as an accessible and cost effective means of
keeping residents informed of the Council’s decision making process
2.
Procedures and facilities for recording Council and Committee meetings
Anyone, including elected members, will be
entitled to film take photographs, make audio recordings, tweet, text message or live blog during any Council or
Committee meeting.
Filming, photography, audio recording, tweeting, text messaging and live blogging will be conducted without disruption
to members of the public, council officers or councillors in attendance at the
meeting.
The Chair of the meeting has the authority to
order anyone filming, taking photographs making audio recordings, tweeting, text messaging or live
blogging to leave the meeting is they cause disruption to others.
as much as this IS a GOOD IDEA, i dont think enough paperwork has been shredded, nor all the t's crossed for 'them' to be as open as they need to be to PROVE to us that they are doing their best for us!
ReplyDeletebut on the whole, go for it. :-) the point of less cost to be up your arse is also a good thing, then you can focus on other things, more important things (as much as this is VITAL) there is PLENTY of items on the agenda to tick off.
I cannot see why our elected representatives should not agree to such a proposal, unless they do not wish to be elected as our representatives in the future.
ReplyDeleteGood work Ian, there is no time like the present to nip this authoritarian takeover of England in the bud, there are some truly shocking developments occurring across the land.
There are quite a few recent filming protocols for various councils available on the web including Leeds council who will not allow it regardless of what Pickles intends. Some of the councils require 3 days notice and reasons and use of the film. Some appear to only allow the council to do the filming and make it available for all with a log of any editing provided for incidents such as people being ill. Some have clauses to protect the vulnerable and children. Special locations for the filming to take place are also provided, as a councillor it would be difficult for you to film and take part in a meeting in this case. Protocols also cover audio and photography.
ReplyDeleteSo I don't think your protocol will easily be adopted by TDC.
But Thanet is not alone in people being ejected for filming, I quote from a local newspaper available online -
"This evening’s vote will be the latest stage in a dispute that saw 11 members of the public removed from a Keighley Town Council meeting by police officers.
Parishioners were escorted out of the July full meeting after refusing to stop filming proceedings."
But Keighley TC seem to accept that they have to allow filming.
If there are 10 councils in Kent that allow filming there must be one that has a decent protocol rather than trying to create one from scratch.