In a letter to Brett dated 28 May 2010 TDCs then Head of
Major Developments, Doug Brown, states that the Ramsgate Port Harbourmaster
had prepared a report for English Nature about Brett’s “batching plant proposal”. For the Harbourmaster
to have produced such a report for English Nature seems very odd to me. Ramsgate Port is located in the middle of an
extremely sensitive marine area which is protected by several different specialist
designations. The port is adjacent to a site of special scientific interest
(SSCI), it’s close to a special area of conservation (SAC) and a special
protection area (SPA). The port also falls within a marine conservation
area (MCA) and there is also a rare Ramsar designated area of coastline next to
the port. Bearing in mind the complex and extremely technical nature of these
special environmental protection designations I cannot believe that it was
appropriate for Thanet Council to have delegated the task of writing a “report
to English Nature with regard to the batching plant” to its Habourmaster.
The Ramsgate Port Habourmaster is not qualified in marine environmental
science. It is my opinion that he is not competent to produce a report on the environmental
impact of a concrete batching plant upon the protected marine habitats adjacent
and close to the port. I’m astounded that Thanet Council’s then Head of Major Developments, Doug Brown, seemed
happy to accept a report from an unqualified person as “confirmation of how
environmental implications (relating to the Brett concrete batching plant) were addressed”. However, this is same Doug Brown
who, after leaving TDC, teamed up with
his former boss and ex-Director of TDC Planning,
Brian White, to advise O’Regan’s on
their unsuccessful application to set up a concrete block manufactory at Ramsgate
Port.
The right thing to have done in 2010 would have been for
Thanet Council and Kent County Council to have insisted that a proper independent
environmental impact assessment of Brett’s concrete batching plant be carried out
by a suitably qualified marine environment protection expert and that this
report would have then been sent to English Nature for them to decide if
Ramsgate port was a suitable location for an industrial operation such as this.
KCC and TDC should also have insisted
that such a report be produced at Brett’s expense, rather than what appears to
have been a highly irregular and improper freebie from an unqualified council
employee.
I will be contacting Thanet Council, KCC and English Nature to find out exactly what
happened in 2010 because from where I’m standing
it looks as though the existing operation
may well be environmentally compromised, which will of course have implications
for Bretts new proposals.
Well said Ian - more dodgy goings-on at the Port. Who actually works there now?
ReplyDeleteWhat happened with the GIAA £500,000 Port fraud?
Good to see at least one of our councilors is active on this - have RTC/TDC councilors approved it already?
ReplyDeleteNo RTC Have issued strong concerns and have asked it be called in at KCC. regards Cllr Stuart Piper
ReplyDelete15:56 Why haven't RTC simply rejectd it?
ReplyDeleteThe largest crane in the UK has suddenly appeared art Ramsgate port for improvements - so why were the pontoons removed?
ReplyDeletewhat happened with the Coastal Communities Harbour street fund? That was paid to RTC before the Summer
ReplyDeleteIsn't Piper also on KCC with Shonk and Heale?
ReplyDeleteWhat's the SLipways building again? Not the porthole café aqgain with jack baker?
ReplyDeleteYes Jack's back with the slipway café venture - have RTC refused this or are they still paying him for the council offices?
ReplyDeleteYes it's Jack again - first the porthole restaurant then the Hornby centre now a café. He must have very good friends onhte council to allow these changes...
ReplyDelete