The planning application for 550 houses
at New Haine Road Ramsgate was submitted by East Kent Opportunities LLP (EKO), a property development partnership jointly owned by Kent County Council and TDC. TDC’s Planning Committee rejected the application in October 2013. EKO then launched an appeal which will be heard later
this year.
Three weeks ago Driver submitted a complaint
to TDC alleging that the Council’s Chief
Executive, Sue McGonigal, may have tried to improperly influence the planning process in relation to the EKO
application. An external assessor has now been appointed to review Driver’s
allegations and decide if there is a case for the Chief Executive to answer.
In the meantime, TDC Leader Hart and his Labour Cabinet colleagues, Councillors
Michelle Fenner, Allan Poole and Rick Everitt put forward proposals which would have resulted in the departure of the Council’s Monitoring Officer, who is
managing the investigation into Driver’s allegations, and his
replacement with someone, who Driver claims “ might be more pliable than the
incumbent, making easier for this extremely serious investigation to be nobbled
and any alleged misconduct covered up”. However,
Hart’s plans were defeated when Independent,
Conservative and UKIP councillors voted to block his proposals at a meeting of TDCs General Purposes Committee
earlier this week.
Said Driver “Thanet’s Labour
leadership are desperate to kill off this investigation because they are key
players in the unsavoury EKO story. It
was TDC Leader Hart, along
with Chief Executive McGonigal, who supported EKO’s plan to build 550 houses at the New
Haine Road, even though they knew it was against Thanet Council’s
Planning Policy. It was TDC
Leader Hart, along with Chief Executive McGonigal , who supported EKOs decision
to appeal against the rejection of their plans, even though they knew that the
appeal is likely to cost Thanet taxpayers
up to £100,000.
I congratulate those councillors from
across the political divide who were brave enough to stand up against the Labour Leadership’s
crude efforts to manipulate, influence and
kill off a very serious investigation
into alleged misconduct in public office. I am a firm believer in open
and transparent government and if there has been any wrong doing by politicians
or officers there should be a fair and proper investigation which is not nobbled
or fixed for reputational or party political purposes. I trust that
Councillor Hart and his colleagues will
now act in public interest and let due
process take its course without further interference.”
I'm no Tory voter, but I don't think that the Labour group is covering itself in glory on this one. It is quite clear that, at the very least, this development proposal has been handled improperly. One would imagine, following Ezekiel's disgrace, that local politicians would be ultra-sensitive to allegations that things have not been done by the book. Any politician who cares about the Council's reputation and image would be supporting the inquiry as a means of demonstrating that there it's a simple case of cock-up rather than corruption. It does not reflect well on those members of the Labour Group who voted in favour of replacing the monitoring officer with a patsy.
ReplyDeleteNot a patsy Anon. Homer is McGonigal's brain and minder. Iris and Clive will want her as Chief Exec next.
ReplyDelete"Homer is McGonigal's brain." I'd never have associated Homer with that part of the body.
ReplyDelete