Pages

Monday 31 March 2014

EKO Cover Up Begins???

Here is a letter I sent to the Council's Monitoring Officer earlier today. The contents speak for  themselves. Suffice it to say I am extremely concerned that the proposal described in my letter
might possibly have an adverse impact upon my complaints about the management of the East Kent Opportunities Planning Application.

Dear Mr Patterson
I have received the report for the General Purposes Committee tomorrow, seeking authority to appoint a temporary Monitoring Officer. I am extremely surprised that   the General Purposes Committee will be making this appointment. It is my understanding that the appointment of statutory posts such as the Chief Executive, the Section 151 Officer and the Monitoring Officer are decisions reserved for meetings of Full Council where all 56 councillors can exercise their choice, rather than a committee compromising of only 10 councillors.

 As the Council’s current Monitoring Officer I seek your advice on the constitutional appropriateness of this appointment process. I would also be interested in knowing if the appointment of statutory officers has been conducted in this unorthodox way before, especially bearing in mind that it was Full Council which recently decided to un-couple the joint appointment of the Chief  Executive and Section 151 Officer, not the General Purposes Committee.

I note that the report proposes  that Madeline Homer the Director of Community Services takes on the role of Temporary Monitoring Officer. I would like to ask the following questions in relation to this proposal.

1.      When did the proposed post holder pass her law degree

2.      When did the proposed post holder qualify as a Barrister

3.      When did the proposed post holder last practise has a qualified legal professional

4.      What areas of the law did the proposed post holder practise in

5.      What previous experience does the proposed post  holder have in local authority/ public administration law and how recently did the proposed post holder have professional experience of working in this field

6.      Is the proposed post holder carrying out Continuing Professional Development to maintain registration as a legal professional

As you are aware, the post of Monitoring Officer is very demanding from an intellectual and time point of view. I am extremely concerned that adding the statutory duties of Monitoring Officer to the already heavy workload of the Director of Community Services is an extremely  high risk proposal. This is something which Councillors were worried about when they recently decided to remove the Section 151 Officer duties from the Chief Executive. I see this situation as no different and believe  that it would  be foolish  to proceed with the appointment of the proposed post holder to this very onerous job because she already has an extremely demanding workload. To proceed with such appointment may well undermine our duty of  care to safeguard the  health and safety and of our staff and may perhaps lead to mistakes and omissions in her work as a result of stress and pressure resulting from this appointment.
I am also extremely concerned about this proposed appointment  because of the existence of major conflicts of interests.

Your are aware that the proposed post holder  has submitted a complaint about me to the Council’s Standards Committee. I wonder how this complaint can be fairly and properly  managed by a Temporary Monitoring Officer who’s role is to advise  and support the Standards Committee in investigating complaint against members. I would be fearful that if the appointment went ahead I may  not have a fair hearing at the Standards Committee.

As you know I have already complained to you about the proposed post holders  role in the submission of the East Kent Opportunities planning application . It is my contention that she may have  behaved in such a way as to contravene Thanet Council’s Constitution. In my opinion it would be entirely inappropriate for the General Purposes Committee to appoint to the post of Temporary Monitoring Officer someone who may have been involved in taking  actions which it might be decided have breached the Council’s Constitution, or other laws and rules which she might  be employed to uphold and advise on.

Finally, I am very concerned that the appointment of the proposed post holder to the Temporary Monitoring Officer post may well have a potentially adverse and unfair impact upon my ongoing complaint to you as the current Monitoring Officer, and to the Police,  about the EKO Planning Application. As you know the proposed post holder has a very close working relationship with the Chief Executive against who I have complained in relation to EKO. I have also complained to you as Monitoring Officer about the proposed post holders actions in this regard. To appoint this person to the Temporary Monitoring Officer post means in effect that she will be overseeing the management of extremely serious allegations against herself and a close work colleague and line manager. This situation seems entirely inappropriate and leads me to speculate that if this appointment proceeds as suggested in the Committee report there will be a significant conflict of interest which could possibly mean that my complaints and allegations about EKO  may not be treated fairly.
I hope that as Monitoring Officer you can look into these matters and advise me what action you may be able to take.

Yours sincerely

Councillor Ian Driver

7 comments:

  1. Harvey offloading ? Oh dear. A bit weak on his statutory duties to report knowledge to police. When you confirm the new Monitoring Officer I can send a helpful guide in an effort to improve the TDC legal advice standard. Rick

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well done Ian: Harvey seems to be playing fast and loose with the council process as with the Pavilion and Localism Act he's attempting to ignore.

    Madeline chaired the EKO council meetings? And has never spoken up on TDC corruption? And was appointed by Mcgonigal?

    Laughable, corrupt old TDC as always. Council fraud is fraud and the Police need to investigate.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The senior management team from the chief executive down is no more than a self serving cabal. They're not working in the public interest.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Call me thick, but when we advertise a job we have to provide a job description and a person specification. The job description sets out the duties and responsibilities of the appointee and the person specification breaks down qualifications required into essential and desirable. You have to do this because, when you appoint, you have to be able to demonstrate that you've appointed the best candidate for the job. Otherwise you leave yourself wide open to claims that you have discriminated against one or other of the candidates. So, what is the person specification for a Monitoring Officer. If you don't have to have any legal background, can I do it?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Only if you have experience 16.52. Milk monitor at school (if you old enough to remember those) For younger applicants VDU cleaning and dust inspection will suffice

    ReplyDelete
  6. Rather disappointed that as a Green councillor you haven't even mentioned the appalling pollution problem that's affecting the country (including Thanet) right now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi I have posted comments about the pollution on my facebook page. I'm very worried about it and the Government should doing more than simply blaming the sahara desert. Much of this pollution is from the UK and EU

      Delete